Zeitschrift “kultuRRevolution”: Neues Heft 72 über Populismus – neuer Verlag K-West – neue Homepage mit allen Informationen

Im neuen Verlag K-West in Essen ist Heft 72 der kultuRRevolution zeitschrift für angewandte diskurstheorie erschienen. Thema: “Populismus: Rechts, Links, Mitte?” Im Vorfeld der Bundestagswahl 2017 laufen die Versuche auf Hochtouren, die “Populismuskrise” abzuhaken, wobei Trump äußerst gelegen kam. Aber die Populismuskrise ist Symptom einer ernsthaften Hegemoniekrise des ewigen Wechselspiels zwischen rechter und linker Mitte. Gerade jetzt braucht es also eine belastbare Theorie der “populistisch” genannten Tendenzen (auf diskurstheoretischer Basis). Was ist überhaupt Populismus außer einem trumpartigen “Stil”? Soll Rassismus neuerdings “Populismus” heißen und warum? Ist Linkspopulismus gleich Rechtspopulismus? Wie geht das Links-Rechts-Spiel, bei dem immer die “Mitte” gewinnt? Warum aber schmiert die linke Mitte in der “Populismuskrise” ab?

Auf der erneuerten und vervollständigten Homepage zeitschrift-kulturrevolution.de, die eine Überblick über alle Hefte, Themen, Autorinnen seit 1982 bietet, kann man sich von der prognostischen und also analytischen Stärke des Projekts kRR überzeugen. Deutschlands Aufstieg zu einer der führenden Weltmächte, wie er auf dem Gipfel in Hamburg konsakriert wurde, hat die kRR seit langem verfolgt – ebenso wie Aufstieg und Krise des Rechts-Links-Mitte-Extreme-Modells. Dazu sind Leitfäden wie Kollektivsymbolik, Interdiskurs, Normalismus sehr brauchbar.

Also lohnt eine Autopsie ganz sicher: bis hin zur Bestellung eines Heftes oder sogar eines Abos.

Tags: , ,

4 Antworten zu “Zeitschrift “kultuRRevolution”: Neues Heft 72 über Populismus – neuer Verlag K-West – neue Homepage mit allen Informationen”

  1. Dr. rer. nat. Harald Wenk sagt:

    Saving mathematicians by the destruction of the eve of logical antnomies
    for the foundations of mathamtics.

    “AS the speaking CREATEAN speaks the TRUTH about the other ALWAYS LYING CREATEANS,
    he LYS about himself TOO, namely LYING THAT he LYS about the othe CREATANS.”
    is plainly undeniable not antinomic at all,
    but ORTHODOX BOOLEAN: TRUE = NOT FALSE = FALSE FALSE for the self-refrential part.
    NO VICOUS CIRCLE AT ALL.

    “All CREATEANS ARE LYING” is thus NOT ANTINOMIC AT ALL, SIMPLY BOOLEAN TRUE –
    for the famous only critical case in question,
    FALSE in the othe case of a lying other CRETEAN.

    Yes, there better should had been never any longer professional logical discussion on it.
    A desaster for the greek epstemics, scholastic, church, university intellectuals
    and scince mor than hundred years
    for almost all intellctuals, mostly the symbolic logicians and mathematians.

  2. DR. nat. Harald Wenk sagt:

    “Unter den Talaren der Muff von 1000 Jahren” hies es zum auftakt dr “kultuirrevoltion” and den massenuniversitäte 1968 ff.
    nun, in der mathemamtik, INFORMATIK, logik wurden noch 50 jahre “draufgerlegt”.
    nachdem die vernunft bei den greichen deuch den “LÜgner” abfdankte, tat sie es im mittelöter unter den thologen nochmal und die grundlagenlkrise dr mathamtik erschüterte das GOTTVEETRAUEN in die GÖTTLICHE; HEILIGE NATÜRLICHE VERNUNFT. das aufkommen der neuen VERRNUNFT RELIGION auf matahtmatik basis.

    die verzweifelung statt selbstsicherheit – eigentliczeds ZIEKL und Sinn der sache, dr NIHILISMUS, die WILLFÄHROIGKEOT UND VEREINNAHMUNG mit PSYCHIATRSIERUUNG durech entzuf dr psychologgsvhen kompetenz in r phiosophischen grundlegung
    wirde zu “Kapilismus und sCizophrenie” in 2 bänden von DEluez (auch massenuniovrsitärtsprpfesseir wro Proifessor LInk) und GUattri (vom Psyvhaiaterfach) “gebündelt”.

    Kollge Foucault hatte “en passant” in den erst Sätzen des “Denken des Außen” die zerstörerische Pardoxie gelöst – es hat nur niemand mutbeklommen – ich auch nicht, Russell, Spebcewr Brown, LUhmann, die ganze Kybernetiktrichtung – alle nicht. auch die frankfurte schule nicht. dEleizre aufsatz übe da denekn eds aussen in “Foucault” geht auch nur sehr neberlös darauf ein. Chatelet – herazsgebe eines struktralischen 8 bändigen histote der phliosophie hatte wohl versprochen da was zu machen hat er aber nicht.

    seltsamerweise ist mein aiuch existilistusvhre dimrnsion entaltenfer folgekommentar nicht mehr da.

    echtr kulturrvoltion in phopsophie, mastmatik, COMPUTERTECHNIK – das ws usn schin 1967 gefehlt hat.

  3. DR. nat. Harald Wenk sagt:

    The BIBLIC King Salomon SOLVED the LIAR and CRETAN ANTINOMY already:
    He decided correctly in favour of the TRUE MOTHER, that the TRUE mother HAD LIED
    as she confessd to HAVE LIED
    in order to save her babies life,
    challenged by a deadly diving it in two halfs sentence proposal of Salomon,
    as a test to a FALSE oath,
    as the FALSE MOTHER hold her LIE.

    So, LIE to have made a LIE to be the TRUE Mother
    is a LIE, reverses the TRUTH value, so that the orginal contrary
    TRUTH to be th TRUE mother, as King Salomon did,
    had to RECKOGNIZE this LIE as a LIE and affirm the contrary,
    that she is NONETHLESS the TRUE MOTHER.

    The death thread affects are used by King Salomon –
    for the child, which is not able to utter a single word, TRUE or LYED!!

    Roman empororers had adhered a lot to Stoics,
    which cahllengende the logic of Plato and Aristotle,
    whe the LIAR antinomy played a big role and destroyed
    the greek science, episteme,
    so that famous sophism prvailed and the old mythic
    belief survived the pLatnic Arsitilean Challenge.

    Nonethles, inmedieval the solution of King SAlomon, the one of FOucault anfd MINE too,
    was not found, though the “insolubia”
    whe retained as “vicious circle”, taken up by
    Russell, Frege, Hilbert, Poincare, Gödel, BROUWER; HEYTING,
    the intionistoic anf constructive mathmatics school.

    a cirtculsr definition defines NOTHIN, a circcle argumentation is NOT VALID,
    does not prove – bkiizt is not contradoctory,
    as x² + 1 = 0 has no REAL NUMBER solution,
    but a extrea invented complex number one.
    This example is indeed used by Spencer Brown in his “Laws of Form”,
    solving thwe LIAR antinomy in a purely EXTENMSIONAL, geomerical way –
    thoufg he was an electrical engineer asnd could have taken
    the pur BOOLEAN ALGEBRA soltion instead,
    going back to thr higjhlyx use and accepted old
    bOLLEAN logic in SCLAS and SET THEoRY
    instead of inventing a new, never used and poularizd calculus of forms
    astray from symbolic, mathmatical logic.

    The sufi story of, where the town governor
    had odered a death sentence by hanged by gallows
    to everybody
    who lies about his intentions, actions, reasons
    to came into town by the gurads of the gate
    and a sufi answered:
    “I come to be hanged”
    THr gate gurads ansed.
    “BUT then we will do what you want”
    “”Only according to YOUR LOGIC”
    answerd the sufi.

  4. DR. nat. Harald Wenk sagt:

    Maybe teh commetary wa sto long, ther for ete second half.

    As the “Essence of humans is both”: Their DESIRE TO STAY IN LIFE
    and their INTELLGENCE, ABILITY TO KNOW THER TRUTH;
    their LOGIC, which are BOTH (that’s the most imporant teaching here)
    challenged and DIMINISHED, made smaller up to
    being reversed to self murder victory of death thread affects,
    it is not the SUFI, this “Rih”, intellgence,#
    but the DEATH THREAD by the governor himself,
    who let the sufi say.”I came to be hanged”.

    Either the guards of the gate do directly what he said and hang him up,
    if he had LIED to desire to behanged up in order to CHALLENGE the whol logic and
    order of th governor and the government,
    he would correctly be hanged, as HE LIES.

    BUt, according not inyl to ther coran, but a lot of
    givernmemts and othe religions to,
    sELF MURDER is not allowed.
    THat is, because thr essence of humans is the desire to stay in life,
    so that people with real yself murde intentins are decalerd pATHOLOGICAL MAD;
    to be NOR THENMSELVES anymore,
    Being defeated by DEATH THREAD affects.

    THis is tackled in Foucazllts article. “Thinking of the outer” too,
    wher the death thread occurs.

    IN the middle ages, deatrh threads whdr strrigly in to use to
    “incestigate” TRUTH in jurdical and criminal affairs,
    including the WITCH CRAFT criminaslities,
    which are a repression of pantheism and heretics by “gover nnement madness” means,
    as we would see it nowadays.

    AS dEATH THREADS MAKE PATHOLOGICAL MAD insteesad,
    in a “self contradictory” “social constructive manner” just described,
    but nonethless in fiul jurdical govermental power,
    the sifi story brimngs the liner of critics detailed worked out
    from Spinoza over Marx, Nietzsche
    to Foucault.
    But the plain logical antinomy is almost superficial as such,
    as iz is in bOLEAN ASLGEBRA and logicds of simple “arithmetical” double negation.

    SO Hegel made a really BAD WRONG PHILOSOPHY when he took up death thread as means of estabklishing GOVERNMENTS
    and it’s sELF CONCUIUSMESS – which is historically correct –
    as a STAGE OF EVELOTION OF REASON
    instead
    of estasblisgihng pathological madness an stupidity and destruction of reason,
    the dAREKNESS OF MIDDLE AGES, mOBARCHISM; FEUDALISM,
    as SPInoza, MArx, Nietzsche, FOucault
    and the Indian, oriental wisdom did too.

    LOOK AT THE CTRITCS OF HEGEL AT THE END – in at th RUB in BOchum there is a Hegel’s archive.

Eine Antwort hinterlassen